24 research outputs found

    Establishment of Asia-Pacific Network for Enterovirus Surveillance

    Get PDF
    Enteroviruses (EV), the major pathogens of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) and herpangina, affect millions of children each year. Most human enteroviruses cause self-limited infections except polioviruses, enterovirus A71 (EV-A71), enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), and several echoviruses (Echo) and coxsackieviruses (CV). Especially, EV-A71 has repeatedly caused large-scale outbreaks in the Asia-Pacific region since 1997. Some Asian countries have experienced cyclical outbreaks of severe EV-A71 infections and initiated development of EV-A71 vaccines. Five EV-A71 vaccine candidates have been clinically evaluated and three of them were approved for marketing in China. However, none of the China-approved products seek marketing approval in other countries. This situation supports a role for collaboration among Asian countries to facilitate clinical trials and licensure of EV-A71 vaccines. Additionally, enterovirus D68 outbreaks have been reported in the US and Taiwan currently and caused severe complications and deaths. Hence, an Asia-Pacific Network for Enterovirus Surveillance (APNES) has been established to estimate disease burden, understand virus evolution, and facilitate vaccine development through harmonizing laboratory diagnosis and data collection. Founded in 2017, the APNES is comprised of internationally recognized experts in the field of enterovirus in Asian countries working to raise awareness of this potentially fatal and debilitating disease. This article demonstrated the summaries of the first expert meeting, 2017 International Workshop on Enterovirus Surveillance and Vaccine Development, held by APNES in Taipei, Taiwan, March 2017

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Get PDF
    In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

    A CASE STUDY ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN THE SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE SECTOR

    No full text
    Bachelor'sBACHELOR OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (HONOURS

    The understanding of organizational learning processes in SMEs : a comparative study between the UK and Malaysia

    No full text
    EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

    “Dream the ‘Accounting Dreams’...”

    No full text

    The voices of accountability

    No full text

    Examining the “customer” metaphor in hospitals : a case study of Singapore

    No full text
    In a competitive society, marketing is done by organisations in order to differentiate themselves from the multitudes of offerings available to the masses. Every day we are bombarded by advertising messages at every corner. It has become so prevalent that even social institutions see the need to market in order to survive. In doing so, have they ignored their social responsibilities and focused on only profit making, treating them as customers more than their users? Or have they embraced the customer metaphor, and improved in their treatment of their users? Research has been done in the US (Hutton, 2005) examining the marketing techniques of social intuitions and how they have veered from their responsibilities. However, there is little to no research available in Singapore. Hence, this study examines the customer metaphor in hospitals and its acceptability, through surveys, focus groups, and textual analysis of news articles and advertisements related to hospital marketing from 2006 to 2009. Our findings show that the customer metaphor has indeed been embraced by hospitals, more so in private hospitals than in public hospitals. This has had a positive effect, resulting in better service and an increase in customer satisfaction: a win-win situation for both parties.Bachelor of Communication Studie

    Mosquito

    No full text
    This group project book includes project information as well as individual reports of all members.Bachelor of Fine Arts in Digital Filmmakin
    corecore